Council File: 98-1384
Title
CPC 98-0170 DRB
Subject
CPC 98-0170 DRB - Req Ccl approve appeal of Director's Interpretation for Section 3.D (Project Exemptions) of the Mulholland Scenic Parkway Specific Plan (MSPSP), which provides exemptions from design review and the provisions of the Specific Plan for a project that has discretionary approval on or before the effective date of the Specific Plan.
Date Received / Introduced
07/23/1998
Last Changed Date
02/10/2000
Council District
2,4,5,11
Initiated by
Department of City Planning
File History
7-23-98 - For ref
7-24-98 - Ref to P&LUM Comt
7-27-98 - File to Bernson, Chrprsn
8-6-98 - File to P&LUM Comt Clk for rept
9-8-98 - Set for P&LUM Comt on 9-15-98
9-15-98 - P&LUM Comt Disposition - Approve appeal w/clarification as submitted in Comt
10-7-98 - P&LUM Comt rept ADOPTED to:
DENY APPEALS IN PART filed by Corin L. Kahn and Mulholland Tomorrow from the Director of Planning's Interpretation for Section 3.D of the MSPSP and, APPROVE CLARIFICATION of Council's intent for Section 3.D to read as follows (footnotes contained in summary section):
Section 3.D of the MSPSP is hereby interpreted to exempt only those aspects of any project for which an application was filed. subjected to a public hearing with legally adequate notice, and for which the project received one of the listed discretionary approvals, and such discretionary approval had explicit findings and conditions of approval which reflect the Scenic Corridor Section of the Mulholland Scenic Parkway Report and which were then imposed by either the Citizen Advisory Committee, City Planning Commission, Deputy Advisory Agency, Planning Director or the City Council. In the event the rules governing the project have changed, whether voluntary, such as an application for a new permit or a changed project, or in the event of an involuntary change, such as a city-initiated change in zone which would change development requirements, the provisions of this exemption shall not apply - CPC 98-0170 DRB-A.
10-14-98 - File to P&LUM Comt Clk OK
10-15-98 - File in files
7-24-98 - Ref to P&LUM Comt
7-27-98 - File to Bernson, Chrprsn
8-6-98 - File to P&LUM Comt Clk for rept
9-8-98 - Set for P&LUM Comt on 9-15-98
9-15-98 - P&LUM Comt Disposition - Approve appeal w/clarification as submitted in Comt
10-7-98 - P&LUM Comt rept ADOPTED to:
DENY APPEALS IN PART filed by Corin L. Kahn and Mulholland Tomorrow from the Director of Planning's Interpretation for Section 3.D of the MSPSP and, APPROVE CLARIFICATION of Council's intent for Section 3.D to read as follows (footnotes contained in summary section):
Section 3.D of the MSPSP is hereby interpreted to exempt only those aspects of any project for which an application was filed. subjected to a public hearing with legally adequate notice, and for which the project received one of the listed discretionary approvals, and such discretionary approval had explicit findings and conditions of approval which reflect the Scenic Corridor Section of the Mulholland Scenic Parkway Report and which were then imposed by either the Citizen Advisory Committee, City Planning Commission, Deputy Advisory Agency, Planning Director or the City Council. In the event the rules governing the project have changed, whether voluntary, such as an application for a new permit or a changed project, or in the event of an involuntary change, such as a city-initiated change in zone which would change development requirements, the provisions of this exemption shall not apply - CPC 98-0170 DRB-A.
10-14-98 - File to P&LUM Comt Clk OK
10-15-98 - File in files
Online Documents (Doc)
| Title | Doc Date |
|---|
| Complete Council File | 01/01/1998 |
Council Vote Information
| Council Vote Information |
No votes were found.